Without any ado, intertubes sensation Remy, on taxes: Continue reading
Archive for taxes
Remy on Taxes
Posted in Taxes with tags goremy, tax freedom day, taxation, taxes on April 16, 2015 by XajowMore Annoying Political Comments
Posted in Deregulation, Economics, Fairness, Government, In the News, Patriotism, Politics, Propaganda, Running for President, Taxes with tags class warfare, Democrats, Deregulation, DNC, fair share, fairness, government, Libertarianism, Mayor Cory Booker, patriotism, Politics, taxes on September 5, 2012 by XajowI really should be leaving this stuff alone, but certain things just irk me. This time, it is a quote from the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, Cory Booker. Continue reading
Tax Cuts Are Not Expenditures
Posted in Economics, Government, In the News, Politics, Taxes with tags Economics, expenditures, government, Politics, spending, tax cuts, taxes on August 12, 2012 by XajowFrom what I have heard in the news lately, I guess I need to go over this one again. Tax cuts are not expenditures. Tax cuts are not expenditures. Tax cuts are not expenditures. Continue reading
Mitt Romney’s Taxes
Posted in Government, In the News, Philosophy, Politics, Running for President, Taxes with tags Congresswoman Pelosi, Harry Reid, Mitt Romney, Nancy Pelosi, Politics, POTUS, Senator Reid, taxes, totalitarianism on August 6, 2012 by XajowYes, I am going to talk politics again. This time about the news story of comments by Harry Reid about Mitt Romney’s taxes. Continue reading
More on the Obamacare SCOTUS Ruling
Posted in Economics, Government, In the News, Philosophy, Politics, Stupid Legislation, Taxes with tags abuse, Constitution, government, health care, health care mandate, Obamacare, Politics, power, ruling, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, taxes on June 28, 2012 by XajowI cannot state strongly enough how very much I dislike the ruling from the Supreme Court today on Obamacare. One the one hand striking down the use of the commerce clause is good, but then turning around and saying the mandate works as a tax is horrible. Basically now the Supreme Court has established precedent for Congress to use taxing behavior or lack of behavior as a means of controlling what individuals do. One of the arguments against the use of the commerce clause to support the mandate was that if the government could force people to buy health insurance, it could then force people to buy broccoli. Well, now, the government can, if it chooses, tax people for not buying broccoli. In other words, you still end up punished for not doing what the federal government tells you you must do.
This is what comes of sacrificing principle for so-called “practicality.” This is what comes of voting into office the “electable” candidate rather than the one who shares your principles. This is what comes of all the excuses for not protecting liberty. You lose liberty little by little.
Thankfully, the number of people willing to fight back against this is growing. The situation is not hopeless. There are rising politicians who are starting to push back against the government expansion of power. And there are growing numbers of people who are willing to support those politicians. Things will change slowly, but they will change.
And I am still holding out hope that someone like Justice Janice Rogers Brown will be nominated to the Supreme Court. I will be very happy when that happens. And mark my words, one day it will happen. Maybe not specifically Justice Brown, but someone like her. Then you will know we are working our way forward to a more free and just society.
Obamacare Ruling from SCOTUS
Posted in Economics, Government, In the News, Philosophy, Politics, Stupid Legislation, Taxes with tags abuse, Constitution, current-events, government, health care, health care mandate, helping others, Obamacare, Politics, power, ruling, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, taxes on June 28, 2012 by XajowSo now instead of using the commerce clause as an excuse to do whatever it wants, Congress can now use taxation powers as an excuse to do whatever it wants. Or basically a combination of the two. This is my understanding of what the SCOTUS ruling means for the U.S. in the long term. Because even if Republicans take control of Congress and repeal Obama care, this legal president will still remain on the books.
Ugh.
Little by little the government whittles away the limitations placed on its power. People sworn to uphold the Constitution are instead using any means they can to ignore it. And now SCOTUS just gave them another tool for that purpose.
And do not even come to me with your “You must be against Obamacare because you don’t care about helping people” nonsense. I am so much not in the mood today. Obamacare is going to hurt the nation, society, and individuals. I oppose it exactly because I do care about my neighbor, about helping others in need.
I really do not like what this SCOTUS ruling portends for the future.